英強さん来てくれ！

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:23:50.91

テキストに乗ってた文の訳が分からない

Peter while Tom had had had had had had had had had had had more marks from the exsmier

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:24:18.60

I think that that...はよく見るけどこれは初

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:25:20.71

from the examinerだった

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:36:01.53

Peter while Tom had had 「had」had had 「had had」. 「had had」 had had more marks from the examiner
こうやるとわかりやすい
ピーターはトムが「had」を使ったのに対し「had had」を使った。「had had」は採点者からより高い評価を受けた。
ちょっと意訳してる

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:38:43.27

Peter, while Tom had had "had" ,had had "had had" ."had had" had had more marks from the examiner.
こんなふうにコンマとかピリオドないと文法的におかしいんだけどね

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:44:12.47

"James while John had had had had had had had
had had had had a better effect on the teacher"
is an English sentence used to demonstrate lexical ambiguity
and the necessity of punctuation,[1] which serves as a substitute for
the intonation,[2] stress, and pauses found in speech.

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:44:59.00

The sentence is sometimes presented as a puzzle, where the solver must add the punctuation.
句読点を入れるパズルやクイズとして使われることがあるらしい

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:46:55.81

>>7
どっかでみたことあった気がしたけどそういう事か

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/18(水) 19:51:04.63

>>4
ありがとうございます！

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/19(木) 00:10:46.97

Asia University

**名無しなのに合格** · 2018/07/19(木) 14:26:20.00

>>4
感動した。ありがとう。